When my younger son was active in debate he often used the concept of Social Darwinism as a justification for the most outrageous concepts and, while the ideology was disproven decades ago, his opponents were usually unable to defend against the argument and he handily won his rounds. In fact, although he has not lived at home for fifteen years, we still have several of his debate trophies in his old bedroom, now referred to by us as the “museum”.
For those unfamiliar with the concept, Social Darwinism is a pejorative term used for various late nineteenth century ideologies which piggy-backed on the popularity of Charles Darwin’s new discoveries. While often contradictory, the philosophy exploited ideas of survival of the fittest as applied to society. It commonly refers to notions of struggle for existence being used to justify social policies which show no sympathy for those unable to support themselves, perhaps similar to some extent to the less well publicized policies currently promoted by the more extremist members of the Tea Party movement. While the most prominent form of such views stressed competition between individuals in free market capitalism, it is also associated with ideas of struggle between social groups and classes. In sociology it has been defined as a theory of social evolution which asserts that there are underlying, and largely irresistible, forces acting in societies which are like the natural forces that operate in animal and plant communities. One can therefore formulate social laws similar to natural ones. These social forces are of such a kind as to produce evolutionary progress through the natural conflicts between social groups. The best-adapted and most successful social groups survive these conflicts, raising the evolutionary level of society generally.
I was working in a southeastern market last week and, as it had been a few years since I had last visited this area, I was curious to see what changes had transpired. The community with which I had previously been involved had been successfully completed and sold out but several new developments had opened and I took the time to visit them.
This market is fortunate in that it did not suffer a housing downturn anywhere near as severe as most other areas of the country. Resale housing prices did not escalate unreasonably and therefore have not fallen substantially. And new home production was not uncontrolled in the boom years and now is down only about a third from the average of the prior ten years. There are three homebuilders whose operations I found to be noteworthy, two smaller local builders who are doing relatively well in the market and a large regional builder who is not doing as well. Continue reading